PuristsPro Question

[rockmastermike]

I get it, PP likes the high end and has forums for the usual suspects: AP, RM, ALS,VC, PP etc, etc....however as a past and future IWC owner, I'd like to see IWC represented, if nothing else, for more discussion, photos and education.

But RMM, IWC is not in the same league. True, however they also have Omega and Panerai represented and I think IWC is at least on par with that tier or level.

Is there bad blood between the two or any other reason IWC is not considered worthy to be included in their fora?

[playtime]

If memory serves, admins of PP prefer that any forum enjoy at least some form of active support from the forum's namesake. And IWC has chosen not to involve itself with PP.

IWC enjoys its own forum on its own company site, and is moderated by long time IWC enthusiast Michael Friedberg (who had at one point moderated the IWC forum on TZ).

Besides, one notable member of DWC is the moderator of IWC forum at TZ--his STFU review of the Rolex DS is a classic:)

Too many acronyms.....

[rockmastermike]

If memory serves, admins of PP prefer that any forum enjoy at least some form of active support from the forum's namesake. And IWC has chosen not to involve itself with PP.

IWC enjoys its own forum on its own company site, and is moderated by long time IWC enthusiast Michael Friedberg (who had at one point moderated the IWC forum on TZ).

Besides, one notable member of DWC is the moderator of IWC forum at TZ--his STFU review of the Rolex DS is a classic:)

Too many acronyms.....

Makes sense, thanks Jason