4Runner? GX? Land Cruiser?
Re: 4Runner? GX? Land Cruiser?
I’ll give these hybrids 5 or so years. If they’re good past 100k miles in these applications, I will be very interested in an LC. Not the same as my UZJ100 was but honestly a better daily very likely. The GX is just another class honestly and I have deep want. But I think many are going to miss the days of $40K 4 Runners that would last forever. A great value proposition in retrospect.
Re: 4Runner? GX? Land Cruiser?
I’m sure they will be fine. The Prius has been out for 25 years now and they are very reliable. Toyota knows trucks and hybrids well so I don’t see any issues.dukerules wrote: ↑Wed Apr 24, 2024 3:00 pmI’ll give these hybrids 5 or so years. If they’re good past 100k miles in these applications, I will be very interested in an LC. Not the same as my UZJ100 was but honestly a better daily very likely. The GX is just another class honestly and I have deep want. But I think many are going to miss the days of $40K 4 Runners that would last forever. A great value proposition in retrospect.
Re: 4Runner? GX? Land Cruiser?
I know it is a little bit of a necro-bump, but I agree. Toyota has a well-established history in developing reliable hybrid power systems. Toyota is also making significant investments in R&D and manufacturing as well to further support hybrid engine development.dnslater wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 7:04 pmI’m sure they will be fine. The Prius has been out for 25 years now and they are very reliable. Toyota knows trucks and hybrids well so I don’t see any issues.dukerules wrote: ↑Wed Apr 24, 2024 3:00 pmI’ll give these hybrids 5 or so years. If they’re good past 100k miles in these applications, I will be very interested in an LC. Not the same as my UZJ100 was but honestly a better daily very likely. The GX is just another class honestly and I have deep want. But I think many are going to miss the days of $40K 4 Runners that would last forever. A great value proposition in retrospect.
I might agree and be more hesitant if it was another brand, but I have some confidence in Toyota.
Re: 4Runner? GX? Land Cruiser?
Toyota is also building an enormous solid state battery plant here in NC.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Re: 4Runner? GX? Land Cruiser?
Yup ^^^ Toyota is a conservative company that’s why they haven’t totally jumped head first into total EV. Also their batteries are the old tech but super reliable NiMH batteries.
Re: 4Runner? GX? Land Cruiser?
They have started moving to Lithium Ion in some of their newer Prius models and others.... but no doubt only after a lot of testing.
Toyota has been slow to jump into EV, but no doubt their long history with electrification in hybrids will allow them to easily jump into that market once the market demand is there.
Re: 4Runner? GX? Land Cruiser?
I don’t see the EV as viable long term, at this point. Hybrids? Sure. Full EV? Only for some can it be an only vehicle. For most it’s a secondary vehicle or toy for those who can afford it.
I won’t get into the cost, damage, or environmental impact of mining and shipping the materials to make an EV. Suffice to say that just because something makes one feel good about their purchase doesn’t necessarily equate to actually making a difference.
I will say that we don’t have sufficient infrastructure to support the strong EV mandates in the USA. Heck, California couldn’t support its grid before EV’s happened, with rolling blackouts even 20 years ago.
I’m all for innovation and options, but the government needs to GTFO of this altogether.
Leave my gas stove alone too.
Now, get off my lawn!

I won’t get into the cost, damage, or environmental impact of mining and shipping the materials to make an EV. Suffice to say that just because something makes one feel good about their purchase doesn’t necessarily equate to actually making a difference.
I will say that we don’t have sufficient infrastructure to support the strong EV mandates in the USA. Heck, California couldn’t support its grid before EV’s happened, with rolling blackouts even 20 years ago.
I’m all for innovation and options, but the government needs to GTFO of this altogether.
Leave my gas stove alone too.
Now, get off my lawn!

Re: 4Runner? GX? Land Cruiser?
We have two cars, both EV. One is six years old and has been in for service once (and that was not really needed, just wanted a safety check). Took it to Americas Tire for tires, once. Drove it from the Bay Area to Palm Springs with one stop, and have made many longs trips with it over the years. Charge mostly at home, and with rooftop solar, generally costs almost nothing. Total cost of ownership so far was basically the drive off price. Oh, and zero to sixty in 4'ish seconds is not bad, as is the instant power to get out of potential issues. Having no oil changes and less or no maintenance has been amazing.
Second EV replaced 10 year old Lexus Hybrid. While Hybrids from that era are not as good as the ones these days, it had almost zero issues too and the fact it was a hybrid was generally not noticeable. It was a great car for a decade and over 100k miles.
Don't disagree EV's still have environmental impact, but so do gas cars - and hybrids even a bit more since they are short range EV's plus gas. In some places that don't have much renewable energy, EV's are yes running off coal, etc so yep, that's worse or the same. EV battery recycling is improving and will more in the future, but no doubt they still have a significant environmental impact both pre and post production.
Totally agree there is not sufficient electrical infrastructure, and won't be for a long time. Also agree government mandates (especially with the necessary infrastructure to support them en masse so far off) are dumb and go too far.
If you want an EV great, they have plusses and minuses. if you don't want one that's great too.
Second EV replaced 10 year old Lexus Hybrid. While Hybrids from that era are not as good as the ones these days, it had almost zero issues too and the fact it was a hybrid was generally not noticeable. It was a great car for a decade and over 100k miles.
Don't disagree EV's still have environmental impact, but so do gas cars - and hybrids even a bit more since they are short range EV's plus gas. In some places that don't have much renewable energy, EV's are yes running off coal, etc so yep, that's worse or the same. EV battery recycling is improving and will more in the future, but no doubt they still have a significant environmental impact both pre and post production.
Totally agree there is not sufficient electrical infrastructure, and won't be for a long time. Also agree government mandates (especially with the necessary infrastructure to support them en masse so far off) are dumb and go too far.
If you want an EV great, they have plusses and minuses. if you don't want one that's great too.
Re: 4Runner? GX? Land Cruiser?
100%raf42 wrote:We have two cars, both EV. One is six years old and has been in for service once (and that was not really needed, just wanted a safety check). Took it to Americas Tire for tires, once. Drove it from the Bay Area to Palm Springs with one stop, and have made many longs trips with it over the years. Charge mostly at home, and with rooftop solar, generally costs almost nothing. Total cost of ownership so far was basically the drive off price. Oh, and zero to sixty in 4'ish seconds is not bad, as is the instant power to get out of potential issues. Having no oil changes and less or no maintenance has been amazing.
Second EV replaced 10 year old Lexus Hybrid. While Hybrids from that era are not as good as the ones these days, it had almost zero issues too and the fact it was a hybrid was generally not noticeable. It was a great car for a decade and over 100k miles.
Don't disagree EV's still have environmental impact, but so do gas cars - and hybrids even a bit more since they are short range EV's plus gas. In some places that don't have much renewable energy, EV's are yes running off coal, etc so yep, that's worse or the same. EV battery recycling is improving and will more in the future, but no doubt they still have a significant environmental impact both pre and post production.
Totally agree there is not sufficient electrical infrastructure, and won't be for a long time. Also agree government mandates (especially with the necessary infrastructure to support them en masse so far off) are dumb and go too far.
If you want an EV great, they have plusses and minuses. if you don't want one that's great too.
Three good friends own Teslas as their second or third vehicle and love them. Another friend has for his only vehicle, but he works from home, doesn’t drive much, and his girl drives a regular car. He did experience issues with the cold weather.
With your own rooftop solar it sounds like a viable option.
Re: 4Runner? GX? Land Cruiser?
Good point about cold weather. EV's lose a lot of range when it's freezing, and charging rates can suffer too until (if) the battery warms up.hoppyjr wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2024 1:10 pm100%raf42 wrote:We have two cars, both EV. One is six years old and has been in for service once (and that was not really needed, just wanted a safety check). Took it to Americas Tire for tires, once. Drove it from the Bay Area to Palm Springs with one stop, and have made many longs trips with it over the years. Charge mostly at home, and with rooftop solar, generally costs almost nothing. Total cost of ownership so far was basically the drive off price. Oh, and zero to sixty in 4'ish seconds is not bad, as is the instant power to get out of potential issues. Having no oil changes and less or no maintenance has been amazing.
Second EV replaced 10 year old Lexus Hybrid. While Hybrids from that era are not as good as the ones these days, it had almost zero issues too and the fact it was a hybrid was generally not noticeable. It was a great car for a decade and over 100k miles.
Don't disagree EV's still have environmental impact, but so do gas cars - and hybrids even a bit more since they are short range EV's plus gas. In some places that don't have much renewable energy, EV's are yes running off coal, etc so yep, that's worse or the same. EV battery recycling is improving and will more in the future, but no doubt they still have a significant environmental impact both pre and post production.
Totally agree there is not sufficient electrical infrastructure, and won't be for a long time. Also agree government mandates (especially with the necessary infrastructure to support them en masse so far off) are dumb and go too far.
If you want an EV great, they have plusses and minuses. if you don't want one that's great too.
Three good friends own Teslas as their second or third vehicle and love them. Another friend has for his only vehicle, but he works from home, doesn’t drive much, and his girl drives a regular car. He did experience issues with the cold weather.
With your own rooftop solar it sounds like a viable option.
All that said, your 4Runner looks fantastic with all the mods, absolutely fantastic.

4Runner? GX? Land Cruiser?
Thank you sir. It’s been a labor of love.raf42 wrote:Good point about cold weather. EV's lose a lot of range when it's freezing, and charging rates can suffer too until (if) the battery warms up.hoppyjr wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2024 1:10 pm100%raf42 wrote:We have two cars, both EV. One is six years old and has been in for service once (and that was not really needed, just wanted a safety check). Took it to Americas Tire for tires, once. Drove it from the Bay Area to Palm Springs with one stop, and have made many longs trips with it over the years. Charge mostly at home, and with rooftop solar, generally costs almost nothing. Total cost of ownership so far was basically the drive off price. Oh, and zero to sixty in 4'ish seconds is not bad, as is the instant power to get out of potential issues. Having no oil changes and less or no maintenance has been amazing.
Second EV replaced 10 year old Lexus Hybrid. While Hybrids from that era are not as good as the ones these days, it had almost zero issues too and the fact it was a hybrid was generally not noticeable. It was a great car for a decade and over 100k miles.
Don't disagree EV's still have environmental impact, but so do gas cars - and hybrids even a bit more since they are short range EV's plus gas. In some places that don't have much renewable energy, EV's are yes running off coal, etc so yep, that's worse or the same. EV battery recycling is improving and will more in the future, but no doubt they still have a significant environmental impact both pre and post production.
Totally agree there is not sufficient electrical infrastructure, and won't be for a long time. Also agree government mandates (especially with the necessary infrastructure to support them en masse so far off) are dumb and go too far.
If you want an EV great, they have plusses and minuses. if you don't want one that's great too.
Three good friends own Teslas as their second or third vehicle and love them. Another friend has for his only vehicle, but he works from home, doesn’t drive much, and his girl drives a regular car. He did experience issues with the cold weather.
With your own rooftop solar it sounds like a viable option.
All that said, your 4Runner looks fantastic with all the mods, absolutely fantastic.
For anyone who may be interested, here is my build thread on the 4Runner forum: Hoppy’s build thread - 2022 ORP
https://r.tapatalk.com/shareLink/topic? ... source=app
Re: 4Runner? GX? Land Cruiser?
EV's work best now if you can charge from home... and in 2 car households. My wife has an XC-40 EV as her only car and she loves it - but mainly charges in our garage. The 2-3 times a year that we need to go on road trips we will take my 4Runner. She saw a little range reduction over winter but not bad as hers has a heat pump. She drives a lot and it has increased our electric bill about $40-$50/month. I'm jealous that she never has to visit gas stations as I am there frequently in my Toyota.hoppyjr wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2024 1:10 pm
Three good friends own Teslas as their second or third vehicle and love them. Another friend has for his only vehicle, but he works from home, doesn’t drive much, and his girl drives a regular car. He did experience issues with the cold weather.
With your own rooftop solar it sounds like a viable option.
The batteries aren't great environmentally from a manufacturing standpoint but better than an ICE when you look at cradle to grave... including the gas that an ICE will use over it's life time. The turning point for EV's will be when they can figure out how to make the batteries from something less impactful than Lithium which will happen.
Re: 4Runner? GX? Land Cruiser?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: 4Runner? GX? Land Cruiser?
I can’t get a 4Runner off of my brain, especially before the new generation comes out. I’ve spoken to at least 4 local dealers and the leases on these are absurd and dealers don’t seem to want to play ball.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: 4Runner? GX? Land Cruiser?
There is no “play ball” on these, they command MSRP pretty much everywhere. They are worth it.zepp21 wrote:I can’t get a 4Runner off of my brain, especially before the new generation comes out. I’ve spoken to at least 4 local dealers and the leases on these are absurd and dealers don’t seem to want to play ball.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Leasing these is never good, but if you’re able to purchase one, they tend to hold their value extremely well. It really is the last of the old-school stuff.
Re: 4Runner? GX? Land Cruiser?
Book a plane ticket to podunk, pick up pre-arranged 4Runner purchase, drive home.
The Hapa
Re: 4Runner? GX? Land Cruiser?
Agreed it just doesn't make much sense to lease a vehicle that barely depreciates. 2-3 year old 4Runners sell for 75-80% of MSRP.hoppyjr wrote: ↑Tue May 21, 2024 9:09 pmThere is no “play ball” on these, they command MSRP pretty much everywhere. They are worth it.zepp21 wrote:I can’t get a 4Runner off of my brain, especially before the new generation comes out. I’ve spoken to at least 4 local dealers and the leases on these are absurd and dealers don’t seem to want to play ball.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Leasing these is never good, but if you’re able to purchase one, they tend to hold their value extremely well. It really is the last of the old-school stuff.
Re: 4Runner? GX? Land Cruiser?
If you’re interested I would definitely suggest trying to source one before they’re all gone. That was what prompted us to get the 21 Land Cruiser and Tundra with the V8s when we did. Last of an era!
Call around to different dealers. We got ours from a dealer in Richmond Virginia who was willing to sell at MSRP. Worth the awful drive up I-95 for it.
Call around to different dealers. We got ours from a dealer in Richmond Virginia who was willing to sell at MSRP. Worth the awful drive up I-95 for it.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Re: 4Runner? GX? Land Cruiser?
I traded in my 12 year old Tacoma for 60% of the purchase price. Simply unbelievable lack of depreciation.dnslater wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2024 4:35 amAgreed it just doesn't make much sense to lease a vehicle that barely depreciates. 2-3 year old 4Runners sell for 75-80% of MSRP.hoppyjr wrote: ↑Tue May 21, 2024 9:09 pmThere is no “play ball” on these, they command MSRP pretty much everywhere. They are worth it.zepp21 wrote:I can’t get a 4Runner off of my brain, especially before the new generation comes out. I’ve spoken to at least 4 local dealers and the leases on these are absurd and dealers don’t seem to want to play ball.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Leasing these is never good, but if you’re able to purchase one, they tend to hold their value extremely well. It really is the last of the old-school stuff.
Needless to say, I bought another.
Re: 4Runner? GX? Land Cruiser?
I traded a 9 year old BMW wagon for my 4Runner. The BMW depreciated from a $55k MSRP to $7,500 and didn't even have 100k miles on it yet. The way Toyota trucks hold their value is really staggering.Ryeguy wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2024 7:56 amI traded in my 12 year old Tacoma for 60% of the purchase price. Simply unbelievable lack of depreciation.dnslater wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2024 4:35 amAgreed it just doesn't make much sense to lease a vehicle that barely depreciates. 2-3 year old 4Runners sell for 75-80% of MSRP.hoppyjr wrote: ↑Tue May 21, 2024 9:09 pmThere is no “play ball” on these, they command MSRP pretty much everywhere. They are worth it.zepp21 wrote:I can’t get a 4Runner off of my brain, especially before the new generation comes out. I’ve spoken to at least 4 local dealers and the leases on these are absurd and dealers don’t seem to want to play ball.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Leasing these is never good, but if you’re able to purchase one, they tend to hold their value extremely well. It really is the last of the old-school stuff.
Needless to say, I bought another.
Re: 4Runner? GX? Land Cruiser?
Speaking of holding value, has anyone taken a look at the prices on last generation Honda Fits? It’s crazy how much a low mileage one will go for.
"It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever."
David St. Hubbins
David St. Hubbins
- toxicavenger
- President Tranny
- Posts: 48293
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:25 am
- Name: HeadDIK
- Location: Colorado Springs
Re: 4Runner? GX? Land Cruiser?
We had a 2008 model and sold it 2 years later for over what we paid for it new. Crazy shit.
Website: http://smallwhitestubbies.com/ 

- bedlam
- Posts: 1577
- Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 11:16 pm
- Name: Carl
- Location: Fremantle, Western Australia (GMT +8)
Re: 4Runner? GX? Land Cruiser?
I don't know if it's the same in the US, but in Oz there is a Toyota tax. A bit like Rolex, the entry price is inflated but they hold that value so the turn-over price is solid.Ryeguy wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2024 7:56 amI traded in my 12 year old Tacoma for 60% of the purchase price. Simply unbelievable lack of depreciation.dnslater wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2024 4:35 amAgreed it just doesn't make much sense to lease a vehicle that barely depreciates. 2-3 year old 4Runners sell for 75-80% of MSRP.hoppyjr wrote: ↑Tue May 21, 2024 9:09 pmThere is no “play ball” on these, they command MSRP pretty much everywhere. They are worth it.zepp21 wrote:I can’t get a 4Runner off of my brain, especially before the new generation comes out. I’ve spoken to at least 4 local dealers and the leases on these are absurd and dealers don’t seem to want to play ball.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Leasing these is never good, but if you’re able to purchase one, they tend to hold their value extremely well. It really is the last of the old-school stuff.
Needless to say, I bought another.
When I bought my Isuzu in 2018 the equivalent Toyota (called the Prado here) was 20K more. Looking at current resale, that gap is still there. So there would have been no benefit in my tying up that extra 20K. My Isuzu has been flawless whilst I note Toyota have had a bunch of recalls.
Toyota have historically made good cars...they are no longer as good as they used to be but that hasn't impacted on the amount of kool-aid flowing around them. IMO Toyota peaked with the 80 series Landcruiser.
Re: 4Runner? GX? Land Cruiser?
Funny as I just did a search yesterday. My youngest kid just got his license yesterday and wants to get a used manual hatchback or sedan. I was trying to steer him towards a fit but he doesn't like them. He is looking at old VW's and Audi's. Guess I will have some oil spots on my new driveway.
90's Toyota/Honda are always discussed as having peaked because they were reliable AND this was before cars started being filled with technology... and Toyota/Honda kept it simpler than the equivalent GM, Ford, etc... who liked all kinds of electronic buttons. By the numbers, Toyota/Lexus are still king in reliability compared to the competition.... its just that consumers demand a lot more stuff in their cars which creates more opportunities for issues.bedlam wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 8:02 pmI don't know if it's the same in the US, but in Oz there is a Toyota tax. A bit like Rolex, the entry price is inflated but they hold that value so the turn-over price is solid.
When I bought my Isuzu in 2018 the equivalent Toyota (called the Prado here) was 20K more. Looking at current resale, that gap is still there. So there would have been no benefit in my tying up that extra 20K. My Isuzu has been flawless whilst I note Toyota have had a bunch of recalls.
Toyota have historically made good cars...they are no longer as good as they used to be but that hasn't impacted on the amount of kool-aid flowing around them. IMO Toyota peaked with the 80 series Landcruiser.
- bedlam
- Posts: 1577
- Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 11:16 pm
- Name: Carl
- Location: Fremantle, Western Australia (GMT +8)
Re: 4Runner? GX? Land Cruiser?
Yeah, I expect my Isuzu will be the last 'dumb' car I own. Everything is 'smart' now and that just means a ton more stuff that can go wrong.dnslater wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 4:18 amFunny as I just did a search yesterday. My youngest kid just got his license yesterday and wants to get a used manual hatchback or sedan. I was trying to steer him towards a fit but he doesn't like them. He is looking at old VW's and Audi's. Guess I will have some oil spots on my new driveway.
90's Toyota/Honda are always discussed as having peaked because they were reliable AND this was before cars started being filled with technology... and Toyota/Honda kept it simpler than the equivalent GM, Ford, etc... who liked all kinds of electronic buttons. By the numbers, Toyota/Lexus are still king in reliability compared to the competition.... its just that consumers demand a lot more stuff in their cars which creates more opportunities for issues.bedlam wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 8:02 pmI don't know if it's the same in the US, but in Oz there is a Toyota tax. A bit like Rolex, the entry price is inflated but they hold that value so the turn-over price is solid.
When I bought my Isuzu in 2018 the equivalent Toyota (called the Prado here) was 20K more. Looking at current resale, that gap is still there. So there would have been no benefit in my tying up that extra 20K. My Isuzu has been flawless whilst I note Toyota have had a bunch of recalls.
Toyota have historically made good cars...they are no longer as good as they used to be but that hasn't impacted on the amount of kool-aid flowing around them. IMO Toyota peaked with the 80 series Landcruiser.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests