Titanic submersible missing

Discuss your favorite music, TV shows & movies, cars and sports here.
User avatar
Wario406
Posts: 6505
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2021 10:27 am
Name: Mike
Location: SW MI

Re: Titanic submersible missing

Post by Wario406 » Tue Jun 20, 2023 2:27 pm

They're gonna have all kinds of issue facing them. Temperature and water being the most important. Im guessing that they had some kind of toilet on board - but, I'd be stunned it it had capacity for 5 adults. The super hard parts are, first they need to be located, then recovered, then they have to open the sub from the outside. Im guessing they can get air into the sub if they can get to it. This'll be a new survival record if they make it. So many odds against them. Cant believe there's no beacon or means tracking. Even a 1000ft radio wire tail would be better than nothing.
It is better to know how to learn than to know.
Dr. Seuss

User avatar
HapaHapa
Posts: 10257
Joined: Mon May 19, 2014 9:57 pm
Name: Eric
Location: Southern CA

Re: Titanic submersible missing

Post by HapaHapa » Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:06 pm

Wario406 wrote:
Tue Jun 20, 2023 2:27 pm
They're gonna have all kinds of issue facing them. Temperature and water being the most important. Im guessing that they had some kind of toilet on board - but, I'd be stunned it it had capacity for 5 adults. The super hard parts are, first they need to be located, then recovered, then they have to open the sub from the outside. Im guessing they can get air into the sub if they can get to it. This'll be a new survival record if they make it. So many odds against them. Cant believe there's no beacon or means tracking. Even a 1000ft radio wire tail would be better than nothing.
I was thinking it could get cold quick, however some insulation has crazy properties these days so it's possible thusday won't be their immediate threat. The 5 gallon water jug that is their "toilet" will become an annoyance quickly. Don't panic, take shallow breaths, clench and hold it, hope for sonar pings.
The Hapa

User avatar
Wario406
Posts: 6505
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2021 10:27 am
Name: Mike
Location: SW MI

Re: Titanic submersible missing

Post by Wario406 » Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:17 pm

I just read an article saying it had a lavatory similar to one in a private jet - but, given the other cheap off the shelf items on the boat I read about (camping lantern for light, video game controller to drive - ya, you read that right) I can only wonder what the toilet was. I think they have much bigger problems at this point. They should have been able to release their ballast to get back to the surface if they had an issue, so current theories are fire, entanglement, or a hull breach. I also read that the CEO had changed the test depth from 4000m to 3000m some time ago due to mechanical hull fatigue that had been identified, but the website still says 4000m. Details will continue to flow out - but, I think it'd truly be a miracle if they were alive and get recovered this many days after the loss of connection.
It is better to know how to learn than to know.
Dr. Seuss

User avatar
Chocodove
Posts: 9323
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:35 pm
Name: Todd
Location: NJ

Re: Titanic submersible missing

Post by Chocodove » Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:24 pm

The more I read about this company and submersible the more it sounds like it was just a disaster to waiting to happen, and now it did.
- Todd

User avatar
HapaHapa
Posts: 10257
Joined: Mon May 19, 2014 9:57 pm
Name: Eric
Location: Southern CA

Re: Titanic submersible missing

Post by HapaHapa » Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:59 pm

Wario406 wrote:
Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:17 pm
I just read an article saying it had a lavatory similar to one in a private jet - but, given the other cheap off the shelf items on the boat I read about (camping lantern for light, video game controller to drive - ya, you read that right) I can only wonder what the toilet was. I think they have much bigger problems at this point. They should have been able to release their ballast to get back to the surface if they had an issue, so current theories are fire, entanglement, or a hull breach. I also read that the CEO had changed the test depth from 4000m to 3000m some time ago due to mechanical hull fatigue that had been identified, but the website still says 4000m. Details will continue to flow out - but, I think it'd truly be a miracle if they were alive and get recovered this many days after the loss of connection.
Lol too many stress cracks doesn't mean decrease test depth, it means derate the operating depth.

Piss in a bottle. I hear that's standard for long-hour drives in the service. Or coffee can if your body isn't "equipped with a hose".

User avatar
59yukon01
1.21 gigawatts?!
Posts: 11037
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 8:49 am
Name: David
Location: Louisville, KY

Re: Titanic submersible missing

Post by 59yukon01 » Tue Jun 20, 2023 4:26 pm



Image

User avatar
Wario406
Posts: 6505
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2021 10:27 am
Name: Mike
Location: SW MI

Re: Titanic submersible missing

Post by Wario406 » Tue Jun 20, 2023 4:28 pm

HapaHapa wrote:
Wario406 wrote:
Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:17 pm
I just read an article saying it had a lavatory similar to one in a private jet - but, given the other cheap off the shelf items on the boat I read about (camping lantern for light, video game controller to drive - ya, you read that right) I can only wonder what the toilet was. I think they have much bigger problems at this point. They should have been able to release their ballast to get back to the surface if they had an issue, so current theories are fire, entanglement, or a hull breach. I also read that the CEO had changed the test depth from 4000m to 3000m some time ago due to mechanical hull fatigue that had been identified, but the website still says 4000m. Details will continue to flow out - but, I think it'd truly be a miracle if they were alive and get recovered this many days after the loss of connection.
Lol too many stress cracks doesn't mean decrease test depth, it means derate the operating depth.

Piss in a bottle. I hear that's standard for long-hour drives in the service. Or coffee can if your body isn't "equipped with a hose".
You’re right. I mis-quoted that. I meant operating depth.

I don’t want to be cynical as lives are at risk or been lost - but more noise is coming out about the OceanGate politics and possible shit show around regulations and how they didn’t believe in them.

At this point I’d be stunned to learn that we haven’t been slowly dragged out by the media so they can make money on this hype. I feel bad for anyone who ends their time this way - but Im calling this dive over.
It is better to know how to learn than to know.
Dr. Seuss

User avatar
demer03
Current Forecast: Vintage Doxa
Posts: 20080
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:41 pm
Name: Moke the Doxa ho
Location: Lake Michigami

Re: Titanic submersible missing

Post by demer03 » Tue Jun 20, 2023 4:39 pm

CGSshorty wrote:
Tue Jun 20, 2023 1:12 pm
Image
Dude




Dude



😂
Old Michigan steams like a young man's dreams
The islands and bays are for sportsmen

Image

User avatar
Chocodove
Posts: 9323
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:35 pm
Name: Todd
Location: NJ

Re: Titanic submersible missing

Post by Chocodove » Tue Jun 20, 2023 4:56 pm

Wario406 wrote:
At this point I’d be stunned to learn that we haven’t been slowly dragged out by the media so they can make money on this hype. I feel bad for anyone who ends their time this way - but Im calling this dive over.
There was an interview with the expedition leader today and he said pretty much the same thing. It’s over.
- Todd

User avatar
CGSshorty
Admin
Posts: 34176
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 5:18 pm
Location: Boynton Beach, FL

Re: Titanic submersible missing

Post by CGSshorty » Tue Jun 20, 2023 5:03 pm

demer03 wrote:
CGSshorty wrote:
Tue Jun 20, 2023 1:12 pm
Image
Dude




Dude



Image
Image
"It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever."
David St. Hubbins

User avatar
Henryj
Bubblehead
Posts: 4668
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:17 pm
Name: Old guy
Location: Wapakoneta, Ohio

Re: Titanic submersible missing

Post by Henryj » Tue Jun 20, 2023 5:13 pm

I see a fewpossible outcomes

1. They’re hung up on something like the Russians a few years back. They may, or may not, be able to get free and come back up before they run out of air and power. If they do come up, that bolted down from the outside hatch is gonna look kinda stupid.

2. They simply lost control of the can and are sitting on the bottom. If they can’t release whatever external weights, at least they can complain to the CEO before they suffocate.

3. They had a hull failure at depth. With comms lost at 1:45 into the dive, they were several thousand feet down. The good news is water at that pressure crushes you so fast the nerve impulses don’t reach the brain so you never even know it happened.

In any case, I can’t really get all “pay stupid money, die stupid ways” about this. Shitty way for any one to go.
If you put a large switch in some cave somewhere, with a sign on it saying 'End-of-the-World Switch. PLEASE DO NOT TOUCH', the paint wouldn't even have time to dry.

User avatar
Wario406
Posts: 6505
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2021 10:27 am
Name: Mike
Location: SW MI

Re: Titanic submersible missing

Post by Wario406 » Tue Jun 20, 2023 5:24 pm

Henryj wrote:I see a fewpossible outcomes

1. They’re hung up on something like the Russians a few years back. They may, or may not, be able to get free and come back up before they run out of air and power. If they do come up, that bolted down from the outside hatch is gonna look kinda stupid.

2. They simply lost control of the can and are sitting on the bottom. If they can’t release whatever external weights, at least they can complain to the CEO before they suffocate.

3. They had a hull failure at depth. With comms lost at 1:45 into the dive, they were several thousand feet down. The good news is water at that pressure crushes you so fast the nerve impulses don’t reach the brain so you never even know it happened.

In any case, I can’t really get all “pay stupid money, die stupid ways” about this. Shitty way for any one to go.
I hear you brother. All your statements are spot on. I think it’s point 3.
It is better to know how to learn than to know.
Dr. Seuss

User avatar
Ryeguy
Posts: 5773
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:03 pm
Name: Chris
Location: Rye

Re: Titanic submersible missing

Post by Ryeguy » Tue Jun 20, 2023 5:42 pm

I’m actually kind of surprised the ballast weight(s) aren’t attached in a fail safe method. You’d think releasing those weights would be one of the most well tested and reliable mechanisms of the sub.

I agree with our resident bubble heads that scenario #3 seems the most likely.

As a dedicated skimmer, I don’t ever foresee myself embarking on a similar adventure.

User avatar
demer03
Current Forecast: Vintage Doxa
Posts: 20080
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:41 pm
Name: Moke the Doxa ho
Location: Lake Michigami

Re: Titanic submersible missing

Post by demer03 » Tue Jun 20, 2023 5:43 pm

CGSshorty wrote:
Tue Jun 20, 2023 5:03 pm
demer03 wrote:
CGSshorty wrote:
Tue Jun 20, 2023 1:12 pm
Image
Dude




Dude



Image
Image
Image
Old Michigan steams like a young man's dreams
The islands and bays are for sportsmen

Image

User avatar
Chocodove
Posts: 9323
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:35 pm
Name: Todd
Location: NJ

Titanic submersible missing

Post by Chocodove » Tue Jun 20, 2023 7:55 pm

No idea what this guy’s credentials are, but a lot of interesting info here not being reported/commented on via mainstream sources.

https://youtu.be/4dka29FSZac
- Todd

User avatar
kempoman
Posts: 2681
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 10:21 pm
Location: Borneo Island

Re: Titanic submersible missing

Post by kempoman » Tue Jun 20, 2023 7:57 pm

the news was saying less than 40 hours of oxygen left if the vessel still intact.
Watch collector since 1989

User avatar
streetracer101
Posts: 8793
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 6:41 pm
Name: Mr Shackleford

Re: Titanic submersible missing

Post by streetracer101 » Tue Jun 20, 2023 8:34 pm

BBK357 wrote:
Tue Jun 20, 2023 1:29 pm
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sYVVGpZNyws
I was hoping this would be Terry's toilet bowl test.

User avatar
Sidheguitarist
Man of many calibers.
Posts: 10569
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:16 pm
Name: Michael

Re: Titanic submersible missing

Post by Sidheguitarist » Tue Jun 20, 2023 8:57 pm

One, I wouldn’t let myself get permanently bolted into a tube in my front yard, let alone pay for it at the bottom of the Atlantic. And two, this:
IMG_0416.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

User avatar
Captdave
Posts: 6891
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2016 3:15 pm
Name: Dave
Location: To be determined

Re: Titanic submersible missing

Post by Captdave » Tue Jun 20, 2023 9:08 pm

Wario406 wrote:
Henryj wrote:I see a fewpossible outcomes

1. They’re hung up on something like the Russians a few years back. They may, or may not, be able to get free and come back up before they run out of air and power. If they do come up, that bolted down from the outside hatch is gonna look kinda stupid.

2. They simply lost control of the can and are sitting on the bottom. If they can’t release whatever external weights, at least they can complain to the CEO before they suffocate.

3. They had a hull failure at depth. With comms lost at 1:45 into the dive, they were several thousand feet down. The good news is water at that pressure crushes you so fast the nerve impulses don’t reach the brain so you never even know it happened.

In any case, I can’t really get all “pay stupid money, die stupid ways” about this. Shitty way for any one to go.
I hear you brother. All your statements are spot on. I think it’s point 3.
Agree wholeheartedly with both of you. Sad and apparently preventable situation.
You would never get me into a tube and send me to the bottom of the ocean!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Live fast, die young, and leave a good looking corpse.

User avatar
Ryeguy
Posts: 5773
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:03 pm
Name: Chris
Location: Rye

Re: Titanic submersible missing

Post by Ryeguy » Wed Jun 21, 2023 3:59 am

Well, the goods news is the rescue team seems to have detected some noises with it the search area, so at least a clue that may lead to something.

The bad news is there doesn’t seem to be a rescue sub with both the depth rating and lifting capacity to get to the missing vessel.

I guess they would have to use some remote vehicle to attach cables to sub and lift it from the surface. I’m guessing that process takes enough time to firmly put it in the “recovery” category.

User avatar
Wario406
Posts: 6505
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2021 10:27 am
Name: Mike
Location: SW MI

Re: Titanic submersible missing

Post by Wario406 » Wed Jun 21, 2023 6:18 am

Ryeguy wrote:Well, the goods news is the rescue team seems to have detected some noises with it the search area, so at least a clue that may lead to something.

The bad news is there doesn’t seem to be a rescue sub with both the depth rating and lifting capacity to get to the missing vessel.

I guess they would have to use some remote vehicle to attach cables to sub and lift it from the surface. I’m guessing that process takes enough time to firmly put it in the “recovery” category.
Where did you read about the rescue team detecting noises?
It is better to know how to learn than to know.
Dr. Seuss

User avatar
CGSshorty
Admin
Posts: 34176
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 5:18 pm
Location: Boynton Beach, FL

Re: Titanic submersible missing

Post by CGSshorty » Wed Jun 21, 2023 6:20 am

Wario406 wrote:
Ryeguy wrote:Well, the goods news is the rescue team seems to have detected some noises with it the search area, so at least a clue that may lead to something.

The bad news is there doesn’t seem to be a rescue sub with both the depth rating and lifting capacity to get to the missing vessel.

I guess they would have to use some remote vehicle to attach cables to sub and lift it from the surface. I’m guessing that process takes enough time to firmly put it in the “recovery” category.
Where did you read about the rescue team detecting noises?
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65969476.amp
"It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever."
David St. Hubbins

User avatar
Wario406
Posts: 6505
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2021 10:27 am
Name: Mike
Location: SW MI

Re: Titanic submersible missing

Post by Wario406 » Wed Jun 21, 2023 7:53 am

CGSshorty wrote:
Wed Jun 21, 2023 6:20 am
Wario406 wrote:
Ryeguy wrote:Well, the goods news is the rescue team seems to have detected some noises with it the search area, so at least a clue that may lead to something.

The bad news is there doesn’t seem to be a rescue sub with both the depth rating and lifting capacity to get to the missing vessel.

I guess they would have to use some remote vehicle to attach cables to sub and lift it from the surface. I’m guessing that process takes enough time to firmly put it in the “recovery” category.
Where did you read about the rescue team detecting noises?
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65969476.amp
Thanks - that's encouraging and sad news at the same time.
It is better to know how to learn than to know.
Dr. Seuss

User avatar
unixshrk
This. Truth.
Posts: 10696
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 8:29 am
Name: Chris
Location: Colorado

Re: Titanic submersible missing

Post by unixshrk » Wed Jun 21, 2023 9:43 am

Image

User avatar
HapaHapa
Posts: 10257
Joined: Mon May 19, 2014 9:57 pm
Name: Eric
Location: Southern CA

Re: Titanic submersible missing

Post by HapaHapa » Wed Jun 21, 2023 10:22 am

Looks like this disaster has transitioned into joke territory, so I wanted to point out that in terms of f#ck around and find out this one really went off the deep end.
The Hapa

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 81 guests